Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Hours to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/h to cL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per hours = 0.0007865791 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Hours to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.86579072e-6 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Hours to Centiliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Hours and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = cubic foot per hours × 0.000786579072
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per hours-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 0.000786579072.
Simple example
1 ft3/h × 0.000786579072 = 0.0007865791 cL/ms
1 cubic foot per hours = 0.0007865791 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/h × 0.000786579072 = 0.0471947443 cL/ms
60 cubic foot per hours = 0.0471947443 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/h | 0.0000786579 cL/ms |
| 1 ft3/h | 0.0007865791 cL/ms |
| 10 ft3/h | 0.0078657907 cL/ms |
| 60 ft3/h | 0.0471947443 cL/ms |
| 100 ft3/h | 0.0786579072 cL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/h | 0.786579072 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours
0.0007865791 cL/ms × 1271.328002 = 1.000000036 ft3/h
0.0007865791 centiliters per millisecond = 1.000000036 cubic foot per hours.
cubic foot per hours = centiliters per millisecond × 1271.32800197
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per hours?
1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.0007865791 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per hours value by 0.000786579072. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 1,271.328002 cubic foot per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per hours to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per hours and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000786579072 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.