Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/h to mm3/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per hours = 7.86579072 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.86579072e-6 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = cubic foot per hours × 7.86579072
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per hours-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 7.86579072.
Simple example
1 ft3/h × 7.86579072 = 7.86579072 mm3/ms
1 cubic foot per hours = 7.86579072 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/h × 7.86579072 = 471.9474432 mm3/ms
60 cubic foot per hours = 471.9474432 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/h | 0.786579072 mm3/ms |
| 1 ft3/h | 7.86579072 mm3/ms |
| 10 ft3/h | 78.6579072 mm3/ms |
| 60 ft3/h | 471.9474432 mm3/ms |
| 100 ft3/h | 786.579072 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/h | 7,865.79072 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours
7.86579072 mm3/ms × 0.1271328002 = 1 ft3/h
7.86579072 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 1 cubic foot per hours.
cubic foot per hours = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 0.127132800197
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per hours?
1 cubic foot per hours equals 7.86579072 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per hours value by 7.86579072. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to cubic foot per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.1271328002 cubic foot per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per hours to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per hours and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 7.86579072 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.