Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — ft3/h to mm3/min
Convert Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per hours = 471,947.4432 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.86579072e-6 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Cubic foot per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = cubic foot per hours × 471947.4432
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per hours-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 471947.4432.
Simple example
1 ft3/h × 471947.4432 = 471,947.4432 mm3/min
1 cubic foot per hours = 471,947.4432 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/h × 471947.4432 = 28,316,846.59 mm3/min
60 cubic foot per hours = 28,316,846.59 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/h | 47,194.74432 mm3/min |
| 1 ft3/h | 471,947.4432 mm3/min |
| 10 ft3/h | 4,719,474.432 mm3/min |
| 60 ft3/h | 28,316,846.59 mm3/min |
| 100 ft3/h | 47,194,744.32 mm3/min |
| 1,000 ft3/h | 471,947,443.2 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Hours
1 mm3/min × 0.000002118880003 = 0.0000021189 ft3/h
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000021189 cubic foot per hours.
cubic foot per hours = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.00000211888000329
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per hours?
1 cubic foot per hours equals 471,947.4432 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per hours value by 471947.4432. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to cubic foot per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0000021189 cubic foot per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per hours to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per hours and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 471947.4432 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.