Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Hours to Fluid ounces per Millisecond Converter — ft3/h to fl oz/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) to Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per hours = 0.000265974 fluid ounce per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Hours to Fluid ounces per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.86579072e-6 / 0.02957352956.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Hours to Fluid ounces per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Hours and Fluid ounce per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounces per millisecond = cubic foot per hours × 0.000265974025974
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per hours-to-fluid ounce per millisecond factor of 0.000265974025974.
Simple example
1 ft3/h × 0.000265974026 = 0.000265974 fl oz/ms
1 cubic foot per hours = 0.000265974 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/h × 0.000265974026 = 0.0159584416 fl oz/ms
60 cubic foot per hours = 0.0159584416 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) | Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/h | 0.0000265974 fl oz/ms |
| 1 ft3/h | 0.000265974 fl oz/ms |
| 10 ft3/h | 0.0026597403 fl oz/ms |
| 60 ft3/h | 0.0159584416 fl oz/ms |
| 100 ft3/h | 0.0265974026 fl oz/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/h | 0.265974026 fl oz/ms |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours
0.000265974 fl oz/ms × 3759.765625 = 0.9999999023 ft3/h
0.000265974 fluid ounces per millisecond = 0.9999999023 cubic foot per hours.
cubic foot per hours = fluid ounces per millisecond × 3759.765625
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounces per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per hours?
1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.000265974 fluid ounces per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per hours value by 0.000265974026. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond back to cubic foot per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 3,759.765625 cubic foot per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per hours to fluid ounce per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per hours and fluid ounce per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000265974026 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.