Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Hours to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/h to mL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per hours = 0.0078657907 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Hours to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.86579072e-6 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Hours to Milliliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Hours and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = cubic foot per hours × 0.00786579072
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per hours-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 0.00786579072.
Simple example
1 ft3/h × 0.00786579072 = 0.0078657907 mL/ms
1 cubic foot per hours = 0.0078657907 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/h × 0.00786579072 = 0.4719474432 mL/ms
60 cubic foot per hours = 0.4719474432 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/h | 0.0007865791 mL/ms |
| 1 ft3/h | 0.0078657907 mL/ms |
| 10 ft3/h | 0.0786579072 mL/ms |
| 60 ft3/h | 0.4719474432 mL/ms |
| 100 ft3/h | 0.786579072 mL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/h | 7.86579072 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours
0.0078657907 mL/ms × 127.1328002 = 0.9999999975 ft3/h
0.0078657907 milliliters per millisecond = 0.9999999975 cubic foot per hours.
cubic foot per hours = milliliters per millisecond × 127.132800197
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per hours?
1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.0078657907 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per hours value by 0.00786579072. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 127.1328002 cubic foot per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per hours to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per hours and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00786579072 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.