Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Hours to Imperial pint per Minutes Converter — ft3/h to imp pt/min
Convert Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) to Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per hours = 0.8305113945 imperial pint per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Hours to Imperial pint per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 7.86579072e-6 / 9.47102083e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Hours to Imperial pint per Minutes
Cubic foot per Hours and Imperial pint per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per minutes = cubic foot per hours × 0.830511394539
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, and 1 imperial pint per minutes equals 0.00000947102083333 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per hours-to-imperial pint per minutes factor of 0.830511394539.
Simple example
1 ft3/h × 0.8305113945 = 0.8305113945 imp pt/min
1 cubic foot per hours = 0.8305113945 imperial pint per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/h × 0.8305113945 = 49.83068367 imp pt/min
60 cubic foot per hours = 49.83068367 imperial pint per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) | Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/h | 0.0830511395 imp pt/min |
| 1 ft3/h | 0.8305113945 imp pt/min |
| 10 ft3/h | 8.305113945 imp pt/min |
| 60 ft3/h | 49.83068367 imp pt/min |
| 100 ft3/h | 83.05113945 imp pt/min |
| 1,000 ft3/h | 830.5113945 imp pt/min |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Minutes to Cubic foot per Hours
0.8305113945 imp pt/min × 1.204077399 = 1 ft3/h
0.8305113945 imperial pint per minutes = 1 cubic foot per hours.
cubic foot per hours = imperial pint per minutes × 1.20407739927
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Minutes to Cubic foot per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per hours?
1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.8305113945 imperial pint per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours to imperial pint per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per hours value by 0.8305113945. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per minutes back to cubic foot per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per minutes equals 1.204077399 cubic foot per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per minutes?
Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per hours to imperial pint per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per hours and imperial pint per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.8305113945 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.