Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Centiliter per Minutes Converter — ft3/ms to cL/min
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 169,901,079.6 centiliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Centiliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 1.66666667e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Centiliter per Minutes
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Centiliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per minutes = cubic feet per millisecond × 169901079.552
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-centiliter per minutes factor of 169901079.552.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 169901079.6 = 169,901,079.6 cL/min
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 169,901,079.6 centiliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 169901079.6 = 10,194,064,770 cL/min
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 10,194,064,770 centiliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 16,990,107.96 cL/min |
| 1 ft3/ms | 169,901,079.6 cL/min |
| 10 ft3/ms | 1,699,010,796 cL/min |
| 60 ft3/ms | 10,194,064,770 cL/min |
| 100 ft3/ms | 16,990,107,960 cL/min |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 169,901,079,600 cL/min |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Millisecond
1 cL/min × 5.885778e-9 = 5.885778e-9 ft3/ms
1 centiliter per minutes = 5.885778e-9 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = centiliter per minutes × 5.885778e-9
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 169,901,079.6 centiliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to centiliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 169901079.6. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 5.885778e-9 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to centiliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and centiliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 169901079.6 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.