Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Cups per Millisecond Converter — ft3/ms to cup/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 119.6883117 cup per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Cups per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 0.2365882365.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Cups per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Cup per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cups per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 119.688311688
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 cup per millisecond equals 0.2365882365 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-cup per millisecond factor of 119.688311688.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 119.6883117 = 119.6883117 cup/ms
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 119.6883117 cups per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 119.6883117 = 7,181.298701 cup/ms
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 7,181.298701 cups per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 11.96883117 cup/ms |
| 1 ft3/ms | 119.6883117 cup/ms |
| 10 ft3/ms | 1,196.883117 cup/ms |
| 60 ft3/ms | 7,181.298701 cup/ms |
| 100 ft3/ms | 11,968.83117 cup/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 119,688.3117 cup/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cup per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond
119.6883117 cup/ms × 0.008355034722 = 1 ft3/ms
119.6883117 cups per millisecond = 1 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = cups per millisecond × 0.00835503472222
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cup per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cups per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 119.6883117 cups per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to cup per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 119.6883117. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cup per millisecond back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cup per millisecond equals 0.0083550347 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cup per millisecond?
Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to cup per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and cup per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 119.6883117 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.