Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Decaliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/ms to daL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Decaliter per Millisecond (daL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 2.831684659 decaliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Decaliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Decaliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Decaliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
decaliters per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 2.8316846592
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 decaliter per millisecond equals 10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-decaliter per millisecond factor of 2.8316846592.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 2.831684659 = 2.831684659 daL/ms
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 2.831684659 decaliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 2.831684659 = 169.9010796 daL/ms
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 169.9010796 decaliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Decaliter per Millisecond (daL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 0.2831684659 daL/ms |
| 1 ft3/ms | 2.831684659 daL/ms |
| 10 ft3/ms | 28.31684659 daL/ms |
| 60 ft3/ms | 169.9010796 daL/ms |
| 100 ft3/ms | 283.1684659 daL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 2,831.684659 daL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Decaliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond
2.831684659 daL/ms × 0.3531466672 = 0.9999999999 ft3/ms
2.831684659 decaliters per millisecond = 0.9999999999 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = decaliters per millisecond × 0.353146667215
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Decaliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Decaliter per Millisecond (daL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many decaliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 2.831684659 decaliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to decaliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 2.831684659. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert decaliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 decaliter per millisecond equals 0.3531466672 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a decaliter per millisecond?
Decaliter per Millisecond (daL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to decaliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and decaliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.831684659 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.