Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Deciliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/ms to dL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 283.1684659 deciliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Deciliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 0.1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Deciliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Deciliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliters per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 283.16846592
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-deciliter per millisecond factor of 283.16846592.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 283.1684659 = 283.1684659 dL/ms
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 283.1684659 deciliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 283.1684659 = 16,990.10796 dL/ms
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 16,990.10796 deciliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 28.31684659 dL/ms |
| 1 ft3/ms | 283.1684659 dL/ms |
| 10 ft3/ms | 2,831.684659 dL/ms |
| 60 ft3/ms | 16,990.10796 dL/ms |
| 100 ft3/ms | 28,316.84659 dL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 283,168.4659 dL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond
283.1684659 dL/ms × 0.003531466672 = 0.9999999999 ft3/ms
283.1684659 deciliters per millisecond = 0.9999999999 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = deciliters per millisecond × 0.00353146667215
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 283.1684659 deciliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to deciliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 283.1684659. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 0.0035314667 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per millisecond?
Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to deciliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and deciliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 283.1684659 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.