Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes Converter — ft3/ms to hL/min
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 16,990.10796 hectoliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 0.001666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Hectoliter per Minutes
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Hectoliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliter per minutes = cubic feet per millisecond × 16990.1079552
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-hectoliter per minutes factor of 16990.1079552.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 16990.10796 = 16,990.10796 hL/min
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 16,990.10796 hectoliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 16990.10796 = 1,019,406.477 hL/min
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 1,019,406.477 hectoliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 1,699.010796 hL/min |
| 1 ft3/ms | 16,990.10796 hL/min |
| 10 ft3/ms | 169,901.0796 hL/min |
| 60 ft3/ms | 1,019,406.477 hL/min |
| 100 ft3/ms | 1,699,010.796 hL/min |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 16,990,107.96 hL/min |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Millisecond
1 hL/min × 0.00005885777787 = 0.0000588578 ft3/ms
1 hectoliter per minutes = 0.0000588578 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = hectoliter per minutes × 0.0000588577778691
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliter per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 16,990.10796 hectoliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to hectoliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 16990.10796. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per minutes back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.0000588578 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per minutes?
Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to hectoliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and hectoliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 16990.10796 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.