Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Quarts per Millisecond Converter — ft3/ms to qt/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) to Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per millisecond = 29.92207792 quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Millisecond to Quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 28.31684659 / 0.946352946.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Millisecond to Quarts per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Millisecond and Quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quarts per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 29.9220779221
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, and 1 quart per millisecond equals 0.946352946 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per millisecond-to-quart per millisecond factor of 29.9220779221.
Simple example
1 ft3/ms × 29.92207792 = 29.92207792 qt/ms
1 cubic foot per millisecond = 29.92207792 quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/ms × 29.92207792 = 1,795.324675 qt/ms
60 cubic feet per millisecond = 1,795.324675 quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) | Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/ms | 2.992207792 qt/ms |
| 1 ft3/ms | 29.92207792 qt/ms |
| 10 ft3/ms | 299.2207792 qt/ms |
| 60 ft3/ms | 1,795.324675 qt/ms |
| 100 ft3/ms | 2,992.207792 qt/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/ms | 29,922.07792 qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond
29.92207792 qt/ms × 0.03342013889 = 0.9999999999 ft3/ms
29.92207792 quarts per millisecond = 0.9999999999 cubic feet per millisecond.
cubic feet per millisecond = quarts per millisecond × 0.0334201388889
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quarts per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per millisecond?
1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 29.92207792 quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond to quart per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per millisecond value by 29.92207792. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per millisecond back to cubic foot per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per millisecond equals 0.0334201389 cubic feet per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per millisecond?
Quart per Millisecond (qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per millisecond to quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per millisecond and quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29.92207792 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.