Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic inches per Millisecond Converter — ft3/wk to in3/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0000028571 cubic inch per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic inches per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 0.016387064.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic inches per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Weeks and Cubic inch per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inches per millisecond = cubic foot per weeks × 0.00000285714285714
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-cubic inch per millisecond factor of 0.00000285714285714.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.000002857142857 = 0.0000028571 in3/ms
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0000028571 cubic inches per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.000002857142857 = 0.0001714286 in3/ms
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0001714286 cubic inches per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 2.857143e-7 in3/ms |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.0000028571 in3/ms |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.0000285714 in3/ms |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.0001714286 in3/ms |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.0002857143 in3/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 0.0028571429 in3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.0000028571 in3/ms × 350000 = 0.999985 ft3/wk
0.0000028571 cubic inches per millisecond = 0.999985 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = cubic inches per millisecond × 350000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inches per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0000028571 cubic inches per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to cubic inch per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.000002857142857. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 350,000 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to cubic inch per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and cubic inch per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000002857142857 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.