Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic inch per Minutes Converter — ft3/wk to in3/min
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.1714285714 cubic inch per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic inch per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 2.73117733e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic inch per Minutes
Cubic foot per Weeks and Cubic inch per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per minutes = cubic foot per weeks × 0.171428571429
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 2.731177e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-cubic inch per minutes factor of 0.171428571429.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.1714285714 = 0.1714285714 in3/min
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.1714285714 cubic inch per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.1714285714 = 10.28571429 in3/min
60 cubic foot per weeks = 10.28571429 cubic inch per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0171428571 in3/min |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.1714285714 in3/min |
| 10 ft3/wk | 1.714285714 in3/min |
| 60 ft3/wk | 10.28571429 in3/min |
| 100 ft3/wk | 17.14285714 in3/min |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 171.4285714 in3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.1714285714 in3/min × 5.833333333 = 0.9999999998 ft3/wk
0.1714285714 cubic inch per minutes = 0.9999999998 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = cubic inch per minutes × 5.83333333333
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.1714285714 cubic inch per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to cubic inch per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.1714285714. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per minutes back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 5.833333333 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per minutes?
Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to cubic inch per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and cubic inch per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1714285714 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.