Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/wk to m3/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 4.682018e-11 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Weeks and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = cubic foot per weeks × 4.682018e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 4.682018e-11.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 4.682018e-11 = 4.682018e-11 m3/ms
1 cubic foot per weeks = 4.682018e-11 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 4.682018e-11 = 2.809211e-9 m3/ms
60 cubic foot per weeks = 2.809211e-9 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 4.682018e-12 m3/ms |
| 1 ft3/wk | 4.682018e-11 m3/ms |
| 10 ft3/wk | 4.682018e-10 m3/ms |
| 60 ft3/wk | 2.809211e-9 m3/ms |
| 100 ft3/wk | 4.682018e-9 m3/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 4.682018e-8 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks
4.682018e-11 m3/ms × 21358310430 = 0.999999939 ft3/wk
4.682018e-11 cubic meters per millisecond = 0.999999939 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = cubic meters per millisecond × 21358310433.2
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-11 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 4.682018e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 21,358,310,430 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.682018e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.