Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — ft3/wk to mm3/s
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 46.82018286 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Cubic foot per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 46.8201828571
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 46.8201828571.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 46.82018286 = 46.82018286 mm3/s
1 cubic foot per weeks = 46.82018286 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 46.82018286 = 2,809.210971 mm3/s
60 cubic foot per weeks = 2,809.210971 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 4.682018286 mm3/s |
| 1 ft3/wk | 46.82018286 mm3/s |
| 10 ft3/wk | 468.2018286 mm3/s |
| 60 ft3/wk | 2,809.210971 mm3/s |
| 100 ft3/wk | 4,682.018286 mm3/s |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 46,820.18286 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
46.82018286 mm3/s × 0.02135831043 = 1 ft3/wk
46.82018286 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.0213583104332
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 46.82018286 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 46.82018286. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.0213583104 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 46.82018286 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.