Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric cup per Minutes Converter — ft3/wk to metric cup/min
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0112368439 metric cup per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric cup per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 4.16666667e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric cup per Minutes
Cubic foot per Weeks and Metric cup per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric cup per minutes = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0112368438857
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 metric cup per minutes equals 0.00000416666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-metric cup per minutes factor of 0.0112368438857.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.01123684389 = 0.0112368439 metric cup/min
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0112368439 metric cup per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.01123684389 = 0.6742106331 metric cup/min
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.6742106331 metric cup per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0011236844 metric cup/min |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.0112368439 metric cup/min |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.1123684389 metric cup/min |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.6742106331 metric cup/min |
| 100 ft3/wk | 1.123684389 metric cup/min |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 11.23684389 metric cup/min |
Reverse conversion: Metric cup per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.0112368439 metric cup/min × 88.99296014 = 1.000000001 ft3/wk
0.0112368439 metric cup per minutes = 1.000000001 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = metric cup per minutes × 88.9929601382
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric cup per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric cup per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0112368439 metric cup per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to metric cup per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.01123684389. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric cup per minutes back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric cup per minutes equals 88.99296014 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric cup per minutes?
Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to metric cup per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and metric cup per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01123684389 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.