Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Deciliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/wk to dL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 4.682018e-7 deciliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Deciliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 0.1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Deciliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Weeks and Deciliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliters per millisecond = cubic foot per weeks × 4.682018e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-deciliter per millisecond factor of 4.682018e-7.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 4.682018e-7 = 4.682018e-7 dL/ms
1 cubic foot per weeks = 4.682018e-7 deciliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 4.682018e-7 = 0.0000280921 dL/ms
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0000280921 deciliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 4.682018e-8 dL/ms |
| 1 ft3/wk | 4.682018e-7 dL/ms |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.000004682 dL/ms |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.0000280921 dL/ms |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.0000468202 dL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 0.0004682018 dL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks
4.682018e-7 dL/ms × 2135831.043 = 0.999999939 ft3/wk
4.682018e-7 deciliters per millisecond = 0.999999939 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = deciliters per millisecond × 2135831.04332
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-7 deciliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to deciliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 4.682018e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 2,135,831.043 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per millisecond?
Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to deciliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and deciliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.682018e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.