Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Deciliter per Minutes Converter — ft3/wk to dL/min
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0280921097 deciliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Deciliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 1.66666667e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Deciliter per Minutes
Cubic foot per Weeks and Deciliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliter per minutes = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0280921097143
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 deciliter per minutes equals 0.00000166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-deciliter per minutes factor of 0.0280921097143.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.02809210971 = 0.0280921097 dL/min
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0280921097 deciliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.02809210971 = 1.685526583 dL/min
60 cubic foot per weeks = 1.685526583 deciliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.002809211 dL/min |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.0280921097 dL/min |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.2809210971 dL/min |
| 60 ft3/wk | 1.685526583 dL/min |
| 100 ft3/wk | 2.809210971 dL/min |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 28.09210971 dL/min |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.0280921097 dL/min × 35.59718406 = 0.9999999995 ft3/wk
0.0280921097 deciliter per minutes = 0.9999999995 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = deciliter per minutes × 35.5971840553
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliter per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0280921097 deciliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to deciliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.02809210971. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per minutes back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per minutes equals 35.59718406 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per minutes?
Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to deciliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and deciliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.02809210971 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.