Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallons per Fortnight Converter — ft3/wk to imp gal/fn
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial gallon per Fortnight (imp gal/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 12.45767092 imperial gallon per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallons per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 3.7583416e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallons per Fortnight
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial gallon per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallons per fortnight = cubic foot per weeks × 12.4576709181
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per fortnight equals 3.758342e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial gallon per fortnight factor of 12.4576709181.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 12.45767092 = 12.45767092 imp gal/fn
1 cubic foot per weeks = 12.45767092 imperial gallons per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 12.45767092 = 747.4602551 imp gal/fn
60 cubic foot per weeks = 747.4602551 imperial gallons per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial gallon per Fortnight (imp gal/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 1.245767092 imp gal/fn |
| 1 ft3/wk | 12.45767092 imp gal/fn |
| 10 ft3/wk | 124.5767092 imp gal/fn |
| 60 ft3/wk | 747.4602551 imp gal/fn |
| 100 ft3/wk | 1,245.767092 imp gal/fn |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 12,457.67092 imp gal/fn |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Fortnight to Cubic foot per Weeks
12.45767092 imp gal/fn × 0.08027182662 = 1 ft3/wk
12.45767092 imperial gallons per fortnight = 1 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial gallons per fortnight × 0.0802718266179
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Fortnight to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Fortnight (imp gal/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallons per fortnight are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 12.45767092 imperial gallons per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per fortnight?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 12.45767092. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per fortnight back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per fortnight equals 0.0802718266 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per fortnight?
Imperial gallon per Fortnight (imp gal/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial gallon per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 12.45767092 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.