Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Hours Converter — ft3/wk to imp gal/h
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial gallon per Hours (imp gal/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0370764015 imperial gallon per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 1.26280278e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Hours
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial gallon per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallon per hours = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0370764015419
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per hours equals 0.00000126280277778 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial gallon per hours factor of 0.0370764015419.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.03707640154 = 0.0370764015 imp gal/h
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0370764015 imperial gallon per hours.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.03707640154 = 2.224584093 imp gal/h
60 cubic foot per weeks = 2.224584093 imperial gallon per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial gallon per Hours (imp gal/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0037076402 imp gal/h |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.0370764015 imp gal/h |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.3707640154 imp gal/h |
| 60 ft3/wk | 2.224584093 imp gal/h |
| 100 ft3/wk | 3.707640154 imp gal/h |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 37.07640154 imp gal/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.0370764015 imp gal/h × 26.97133374 = 0.9999999989 ft3/wk
0.0370764015 imperial gallon per hours = 0.9999999989 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial gallon per hours × 26.9713337436
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Hours (imp gal/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallon per hours are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0370764015 imperial gallon per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per hours?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.03707640154. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per hours back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per hours equals 26.97133374 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per hours?
Imperial gallon per Hours (imp gal/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial gallon per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.03707640154 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.