Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Minutes Converter — ft3/wk to imp gal/min
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial gallon per Minutes (imp gal/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.00061794 imperial gallon per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 7.57681667e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Minutes
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial gallon per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallon per minutes = cubic foot per weeks × 0.000617940025699
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per minutes equals 0.0000757681666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial gallon per minutes factor of 0.000617940025699.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.0006179400257 = 0.00061794 imp gal/min
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.00061794 imperial gallon per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.0006179400257 = 0.0370764015 imp gal/min
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0370764015 imperial gallon per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial gallon per Minutes (imp gal/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.000061794 imp gal/min |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.00061794 imp gal/min |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.0061794003 imp gal/min |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.0370764015 imp gal/min |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.0617940026 imp gal/min |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 0.6179400257 imp gal/min |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.00061794 imp gal/min × 1618.280025 = 0.9999999584 ft3/wk
0.00061794 imperial gallon per minutes = 0.9999999584 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial gallon per minutes × 1618.28002462
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Minutes to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Minutes (imp gal/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallon per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.00061794 imperial gallon per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.0006179400257. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per minutes back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per minutes equals 1,618.280025 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per minutes?
Imperial gallon per Minutes (imp gal/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial gallon per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial gallon per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0006179400257 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.