Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours Converter — ft3/wk to imp pt/h
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.2966112123 imperial pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 1.57850347e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per hours = cubic foot per weeks × 0.296611212335
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial pint per hours factor of 0.296611212335.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.2966112123 = 0.2966112123 imp pt/h
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.2966112123 imperial pint per hours.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.2966112123 = 17.79667274 imp pt/h
60 cubic foot per weeks = 17.79667274 imperial pint per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0296611212 imp pt/h |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.2966112123 imp pt/h |
| 10 ft3/wk | 2.966112123 imp pt/h |
| 60 ft3/wk | 17.79667274 imp pt/h |
| 100 ft3/wk | 29.66112123 imp pt/h |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 296.6112123 imp pt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.2966112123 imp pt/h × 3.371416718 = 0.9999999999 ft3/wk
0.2966112123 imperial pint per hours = 0.9999999999 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial pint per hours × 3.37141671795
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per hours are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.2966112123 imperial pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial pint per hours?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.2966112123. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 3.371416718 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial pint per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.2966112123 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.