Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds Converter — ft3/wk to imp pt/s
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.000082392 imperial pint per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 0.00056826125.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial pint per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0000823920034265
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 0.00056826125 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial pint per seconds factor of 0.0000823920034265.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.00008239200343 = 0.000082392 imp pt/s
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.000082392 imperial pint per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.00008239200343 = 0.0049435202 imp pt/s
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0049435202 imperial pint per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0000082392 imp pt/s |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.000082392 imp pt/s |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.00082392 imp pt/s |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.0049435202 imp pt/s |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.0082392003 imp pt/s |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 0.0823920034 imp pt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.000082392 imp pt/s × 12137.10018 = 0.9999999584 ft3/wk
0.000082392 imperial pint per seconds = 0.9999999584 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial pint per seconds × 12137.1001846
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.000082392 imperial pint per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial pint per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.00008239200343. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per seconds back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 12,137.10018 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per seconds?
Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial pint per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial pint per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00008239200343 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.