Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Decades Converter — ft3/wk to imp qt/decade
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 13,000.20249 imperial quart per decades). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Decades converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 3.60149643e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Decades
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial quart per Decades both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per decades = cubic foot per weeks × 13000.2024866
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial quart per decades equals 3.601496e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial quart per decades factor of 13000.2024866.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 13000.20249 = 13,000.20249 imp qt/decade
1 cubic foot per weeks = 13,000.20249 imperial quart per decades.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 13000.20249 = 780,012.1492 imp qt/decade
60 cubic foot per weeks = 780,012.1492 imperial quart per decades.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 1,300.020249 imp qt/decade |
| 1 ft3/wk | 13,000.20249 imp qt/decade |
| 10 ft3/wk | 130,002.0249 imp qt/decade |
| 60 ft3/wk | 780,012.1492 imp qt/decade |
| 100 ft3/wk | 1,300,020.249 imp qt/decade |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 13,000,202.49 imp qt/decade |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Decades to Cubic foot per Weeks
1 imp qt/decade × 0.0000769218788 = 0.0000769219 ft3/wk
1 imperial quart per decades = 0.0000769219 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial quart per decades × 0.0000769218787964
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Decades to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per decades are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 13,000.20249 imperial quart per decades, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial quart per decades?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 13000.20249. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per decades back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per decades equals 0.0000769219 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per decades?
Imperial quart per Decades (imp qt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial quart per decades conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial quart per decades are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 13000.20249 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.