Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — ft3/wk to imp qt/s
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.000041196 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
Cubic foot per Weeks and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0000411960017132
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 0.0000411960017132.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.00004119600171 = 0.000041196 imp qt/s
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.000041196 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.00004119600171 = 0.0024717601 imp qt/s
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0024717601 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0000041196 imp qt/s |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.000041196 imp qt/s |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.00041196 imp qt/s |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.0024717601 imp qt/s |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.0041196002 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 0.0411960017 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.000041196 imp qt/s × 24274.20037 = 0.9999999584 ft3/wk
0.000041196 imperial quart per seconds = 0.9999999584 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 24274.2003693
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.000041196 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.00004119600171. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 24,274.20037 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00004119600171 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.