Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days Converter — ft3/wk to metric tsp/d
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 809.0527598 metric teaspoon per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 5.78703704e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days
Cubic foot per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per days = cubic foot per weeks × 809.052759771
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per days equals 5.787037e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per days factor of 809.052759771.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 809.0527598 = 809.0527598 metric tsp/d
1 cubic foot per weeks = 809.0527598 metric teaspoon per days.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 809.0527598 = 48,543.16559 metric tsp/d
60 cubic foot per weeks = 48,543.16559 metric teaspoon per days.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 80.90527598 metric tsp/d |
| 1 ft3/wk | 809.0527598 metric tsp/d |
| 10 ft3/wk | 8,090.527598 metric tsp/d |
| 60 ft3/wk | 48,543.16559 metric tsp/d |
| 100 ft3/wk | 80,905.27598 metric tsp/d |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 809,052.7598 metric tsp/d |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Days to Cubic foot per Weeks
809.0527598 metric tsp/d × 0.001236013335 = 1 ft3/wk
809.0527598 metric teaspoon per days = 1 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = metric teaspoon per days × 0.00123601333525
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Days to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per days are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 809.0527598 metric teaspoon per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per days?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 809.0527598. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per days back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per days equals 0.0012360133 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per days?
Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and metric teaspoon per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 809.0527598 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.