Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours Converter — ft3/wk to metric tsp/h
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 33.71053166 metric teaspoon per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 1.38888889e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours
Cubic foot per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per hours = cubic foot per weeks × 33.7105316571
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 1.388889e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per hours factor of 33.7105316571.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 33.71053166 = 33.71053166 metric tsp/h
1 cubic foot per weeks = 33.71053166 metric teaspoon per hours.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 33.71053166 = 2,022.631899 metric tsp/h
60 cubic foot per weeks = 2,022.631899 metric teaspoon per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 3.371053166 metric tsp/h |
| 1 ft3/wk | 33.71053166 metric tsp/h |
| 10 ft3/wk | 337.1053166 metric tsp/h |
| 60 ft3/wk | 2,022.631899 metric tsp/h |
| 100 ft3/wk | 3,371.053166 metric tsp/h |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 33,710.53166 metric tsp/h |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks
33.71053166 metric tsp/h × 0.02966432005 = 1 ft3/wk
33.71053166 metric teaspoon per hours = 1 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = metric teaspoon per hours × 0.0296643200461
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Hours to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per hours are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 33.71053166 metric teaspoon per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 33.71053166. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per hours back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 0.0296643201 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per hours?
Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and metric teaspoon per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 33.71053166 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.