Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds Converter — ft3/wk to metric tsp/s
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0093640366 metric teaspoon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 5e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds
Cubic foot per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 0.00936403657143
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.000005 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per seconds factor of 0.00936403657143.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.009364036571 = 0.0093640366 metric tsp/s
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0093640366 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.009364036571 = 0.5618421943 metric tsp/s
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.5618421943 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 0.0009364037 metric tsp/s |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.0093640366 metric tsp/s |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.0936403657 metric tsp/s |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.5618421943 metric tsp/s |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.9364036571 metric tsp/s |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 9.364036571 metric tsp/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.0093640366 metric tsp/s × 106.7915522 = 1.000000003 ft3/wk
0.0093640366 metric teaspoon per seconds = 1.000000003 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = metric teaspoon per seconds × 106.791552166
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0093640366 metric teaspoon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.009364036571. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per seconds back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 106.7915522 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per seconds?
Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and metric teaspoon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.009364036571 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.