Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Weeks Converter — ft3/wk to metric tsp/wk
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 5,663.369318 metric teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 8.26719577e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
Cubic foot per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per weeks = cubic foot per weeks × 5663.3693184
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per weeks factor of 5663.3693184.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 5663.369318 = 5,663.369318 metric tsp/wk
1 cubic foot per weeks = 5,663.369318 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 5663.369318 = 339,802.1591 metric tsp/wk
60 cubic foot per weeks = 339,802.1591 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 566.3369318 metric tsp/wk |
| 1 ft3/wk | 5,663.369318 metric tsp/wk |
| 10 ft3/wk | 56,633.69318 metric tsp/wk |
| 60 ft3/wk | 339,802.1591 metric tsp/wk |
| 100 ft3/wk | 566,336.9318 metric tsp/wk |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 5,663,369.318 metric tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic foot per Weeks
1 metric tsp/wk × 0.0001765733336 = 0.0001765733 ft3/wk
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0001765733 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = metric teaspoon per weeks × 0.000176573333607
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per weeks are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 5,663.369318 metric teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 5663.369318. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 0.0001765733 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to metric teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and metric teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5663.369318 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.