Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Teaspoons per Millisecond Converter — ft3/wk to tsp/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) to Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0000094991 teaspoon per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Weeks to Teaspoons per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.68201829e-8 / 0.004928921594.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Weeks to Teaspoons per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Weeks and Teaspoon per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoons per millisecond = cubic foot per weeks × 0.00000949907235622
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, and 1 teaspoon per millisecond equals 0.00492892159375 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per weeks-to-teaspoon per millisecond factor of 0.00000949907235622.
Simple example
1 ft3/wk × 0.000009499072356 = 0.0000094991 tsp/ms
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0000094991 teaspoons per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/wk × 0.000009499072356 = 0.0005699443 tsp/ms
60 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0005699443 teaspoons per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) | Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/wk | 9.499072e-7 tsp/ms |
| 1 ft3/wk | 0.0000094991 tsp/ms |
| 10 ft3/wk | 0.0000949907 tsp/ms |
| 60 ft3/wk | 0.0005699443 tsp/ms |
| 100 ft3/wk | 0.0009499072 tsp/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/wk | 0.0094990724 tsp/ms |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks
0.0000094991 tsp/ms × 105273.4375 = 1.00000291 ft3/wk
0.0000094991 teaspoons per millisecond = 1.00000291 cubic foot per weeks.
cubic foot per weeks = teaspoons per millisecond × 105273.4375
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoons per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per weeks?
1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0000094991 teaspoons per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks to teaspoon per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per weeks value by 0.000009499072356. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per millisecond back to cubic foot per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per millisecond equals 105,273.4375 cubic foot per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per millisecond?
Teaspoon per Millisecond (tsp/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per weeks to teaspoon per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per weeks and teaspoon per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000009499072356 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.