Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Years to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — ft3/yr to cL/s
Convert Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per years = 0.0000897325 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Years to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-10 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Years to Centiliter per Seconds
Cubic foot per Years and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = cubic foot per years × 0.0000897325146991
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per years equals 8.973251e-10 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per years-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.0000897325146991.
Simple example
1 ft3/yr × 0.0000897325147 = 0.0000897325 cL/s
1 cubic foot per years = 0.0000897325 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/yr × 0.0000897325147 = 0.0053839509 cL/s
60 cubic foot per years = 0.0053839509 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/yr | 0.0000089733 cL/s |
| 1 ft3/yr | 0.0000897325 cL/s |
| 10 ft3/yr | 0.0008973251 cL/s |
| 60 ft3/yr | 0.0053839509 cL/s |
| 100 ft3/yr | 0.0089732515 cL/s |
| 1,000 ft3/yr | 0.0897325147 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Years
0.0000897325 cL/s × 11144.23243 = 0.9999998362 ft3/yr
0.0000897325 centiliter per seconds = 0.9999998362 cubic foot per years.
cubic foot per years = centiliter per seconds × 11144.2324263
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Years.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per years?
1 cubic foot per years equals 0.0000897325 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per years to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per years value by 0.0000897325147. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to cubic foot per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 11,144.23243 cubic foot per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per years?
Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per years to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per years and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0000897325147 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.