Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Years to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — ft3/yr to cm3/h
Convert Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per years = 3.230370529 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Years to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-10 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Years to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Cubic foot per Years and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = cubic foot per years × 3.23037052917
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per years equals 8.973251e-10 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per years-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 3.23037052917.
Simple example
1 ft3/yr × 3.230370529 = 3.230370529 cm3/h
1 cubic foot per years = 3.230370529 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 ft3/yr × 3.230370529 = 193.8222318 cm3/h
60 cubic foot per years = 193.8222318 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/yr | 0.3230370529 cm3/h |
| 1 ft3/yr | 3.230370529 cm3/h |
| 10 ft3/yr | 32.30370529 cm3/h |
| 60 ft3/yr | 193.8222318 cm3/h |
| 100 ft3/yr | 323.0370529 cm3/h |
| 1,000 ft3/yr | 3,230.370529 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Cubic foot per Years
3.230370529 cm3/h × 0.3095620118 = 0.9999999999 ft3/yr
3.230370529 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.9999999999 cubic foot per years.
cubic foot per years = cubic centimeter per hours × 0.309562011841
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Cubic foot per Years.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 cubic foot per years?
1 cubic foot per years equals 3.230370529 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per years to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the cubic foot per years value by 3.230370529. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to cubic foot per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 0.3095620118 cubic foot per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per years?
Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per years to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per years and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.230370529 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.