Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Years to Imperial pint per Hours Converter — ft3/yr to imp pt/h
Convert Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) to Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per years = 0.0056846574 imperial pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Years to Imperial pint per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-10 / 1.57850347e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Years to Imperial pint per Hours
Cubic foot per Years and Imperial pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per hours = cubic foot per years × 0.00568465741623
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per years equals 8.973251e-10 base units, and 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per years-to-imperial pint per hours factor of 0.00568465741623.
Simple example
1 ft3/yr × 0.005684657416 = 0.0056846574 imp pt/h
1 cubic foot per years = 0.0056846574 imperial pint per hours.
Real-world example
60 ft3/yr × 0.005684657416 = 0.341079445 imp pt/h
60 cubic foot per years = 0.341079445 imperial pint per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) | Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/yr | 0.0005684657 imp pt/h |
| 1 ft3/yr | 0.0056846574 imp pt/h |
| 10 ft3/yr | 0.0568465742 imp pt/h |
| 60 ft3/yr | 0.341079445 imp pt/h |
| 100 ft3/yr | 0.5684657416 imp pt/h |
| 1,000 ft3/yr | 5.684657416 imp pt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic foot per Years
0.0056846574 imp pt/h × 175.9120958 = 0.9999999971 ft3/yr
0.0056846574 imperial pint per hours = 0.9999999971 cubic foot per years.
cubic foot per years = imperial pint per hours × 175.912095801
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic foot per Years.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per hours are in 1 cubic foot per years?
1 cubic foot per years equals 0.0056846574 imperial pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per years to imperial pint per hours?
Multiply the cubic foot per years value by 0.005684657416. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours back to cubic foot per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 175.9120958 cubic foot per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per years?
Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per years to imperial pint per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per years and imperial pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.005684657416 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.