Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inches per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — in3/fn to mL/s
Convert Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per fortnight = 0.0000135475 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inches per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.35475066e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inches per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds
Cubic inch per Fortnight and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = cubic inches per fortnight × 0.0000135475066138
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per fortnight equals 1.354751e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per fortnight-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.0000135475066138.
Simple example
1 in3/fn × 0.00001354750661 = 0.0000135475 mL/s
1 cubic inch per fortnight = 0.0000135475 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 in3/fn × 0.00001354750661 = 0.0008128504 mL/s
60 cubic inches per fortnight = 0.0008128504 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/fn | 0.0000013548 mL/s |
| 1 in3/fn | 0.0000135475 mL/s |
| 10 in3/fn | 0.0001354751 mL/s |
| 60 in3/fn | 0.0008128504 mL/s |
| 100 in3/fn | 0.0013547507 mL/s |
| 1,000 in3/fn | 0.0135475066 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic inch per Fortnight
0.0000135475 mL/s × 73814.32086 = 0.9999995118 in3/fn
0.0000135475 milliliter per seconds = 0.9999995118 cubic inches per fortnight.
cubic inches per fortnight = milliliter per seconds × 73814.320857
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic inch per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 cubic inch per fortnight?
1 cubic inch per fortnight equals 0.0000135475 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per fortnight to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic inch per fortnight value by 0.00001354750661. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to cubic inch per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 73,814.32086 cubic inches per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per fortnight?
Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per fortnight to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per fortnight and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001354750661 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.