Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inches per Fortnight to Imperial pint per Hours Converter — in3/fn to imp pt/h
Convert Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn) to Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per fortnight = 0.000085825 imperial pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inches per Fortnight to Imperial pint per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.35475066e-11 / 1.57850347e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inches per Fortnight to Imperial pint per Hours
Cubic inch per Fortnight and Imperial pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per hours = cubic inches per fortnight × 0.0000858250035693
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per fortnight equals 1.354751e-11 base units, and 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per fortnight-to-imperial pint per hours factor of 0.0000858250035693.
Simple example
1 in3/fn × 0.00008582500357 = 0.000085825 imp pt/h
1 cubic inch per fortnight = 0.000085825 imperial pint per hours.
Real-world example
60 in3/fn × 0.00008582500357 = 0.0051495002 imp pt/h
60 cubic inches per fortnight = 0.0051495002 imperial pint per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn) | Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/fn | 0.0000085825 imp pt/h |
| 1 in3/fn | 0.000085825 imp pt/h |
| 10 in3/fn | 0.00085825 imp pt/h |
| 60 in3/fn | 0.0051495002 imp pt/h |
| 100 in3/fn | 0.0085825004 imp pt/h |
| 1,000 in3/fn | 0.0858250036 imp pt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic inch per Fortnight
0.000085825 imp pt/h × 11651.61618 = 0.9999999584 in3/fn
0.000085825 imperial pint per hours = 0.9999999584 cubic inches per fortnight.
cubic inches per fortnight = imperial pint per hours × 11651.6161772
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic inch per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per hours are in 1 cubic inch per fortnight?
1 cubic inch per fortnight equals 0.000085825 imperial pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per fortnight to imperial pint per hours?
Multiply the cubic inch per fortnight value by 0.00008582500357. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours back to cubic inch per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 11,651.61618 cubic inches per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per fortnight?
Cubic inch per Fortnight (in3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per fortnight to imperial pint per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per fortnight and imperial pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00008582500357 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.