Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inch per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — in3/h to cm3/s
Convert Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per hours = 0.0045519622 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inch per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.55196222e-9 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inch per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Cubic inch per Hours and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = cubic inch per hours × 0.00455196222222
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per hours equals 4.551962e-9 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per hours-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.00455196222222.
Simple example
1 in3/h × 0.004551962222 = 0.0045519622 cm3/s
1 cubic inch per hours = 0.0045519622 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 in3/h × 0.004551962222 = 0.2731177333 cm3/s
60 cubic inch per hours = 0.2731177333 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/h | 0.0004551962 cm3/s |
| 1 in3/h | 0.0045519622 cm3/s |
| 10 in3/h | 0.0455196222 cm3/s |
| 60 in3/h | 0.2731177333 cm3/s |
| 100 in3/h | 0.4551962222 cm3/s |
| 1,000 in3/h | 4.551962222 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic inch per Hours
0.0045519622 cm3/s × 219.6854787 = 0.9999999951 in3/h
0.0045519622 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.9999999951 cubic inch per hours.
cubic inch per hours = cubic centimeter per seconds × 219.685478741
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic inch per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 cubic inch per hours?
1 cubic inch per hours equals 0.0045519622 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per hours to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic inch per hours value by 0.004551962222. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to cubic inch per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 219.6854787 cubic inch per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per hours?
Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per hours to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per hours and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.004551962222 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.