Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inches per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes Converter — in3/ms to bu/min
Convert Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) to Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per millisecond = 27.90152621 bushel per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inches per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.016387064 / 0.0005873178361.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inches per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes
Cubic inch per Millisecond and Bushel per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per minutes = cubic inches per millisecond × 27.9015262135
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, and 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per millisecond-to-bushel per minutes factor of 27.9015262135.
Simple example
1 in3/ms × 27.90152621 = 27.90152621 bu/min
1 cubic inch per millisecond = 27.90152621 bushel per minutes.
Real-world example
60 in3/ms × 27.90152621 = 1,674.091573 bu/min
60 cubic inches per millisecond = 1,674.091573 bushel per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) | Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/ms | 2.790152621 bu/min |
| 1 in3/ms | 27.90152621 bu/min |
| 10 in3/ms | 279.0152621 bu/min |
| 60 in3/ms | 1,674.091573 bu/min |
| 100 in3/ms | 2,790.152621 bu/min |
| 1,000 in3/ms | 27,901.52621 bu/min |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Minutes to Cubic inch per Millisecond
27.90152621 bu/min × 0.03584033333 = 0.9999999999 in3/ms
27.90152621 bushel per minutes = 0.9999999999 cubic inches per millisecond.
cubic inches per millisecond = bushel per minutes × 0.0358403333333
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Minutes to Cubic inch per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per minutes are in 1 cubic inch per millisecond?
1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 27.90152621 bushel per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond to bushel per minutes?
Multiply the cubic inch per millisecond value by 27.90152621. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per minutes back to cubic inch per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0358403333 cubic inches per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per millisecond to bushel per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per millisecond and bushel per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 27.90152621 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.