Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inches per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds Converter — in3/ms to bu/s
Convert Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) to Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per millisecond = 0.4650254369 bushel per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inches per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.016387064 / 0.03523907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inches per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds
Cubic inch per Millisecond and Bushel per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per seconds = cubic inches per millisecond × 0.465025436891
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, and 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per millisecond-to-bushel per seconds factor of 0.465025436891.
Simple example
1 in3/ms × 0.4650254369 = 0.4650254369 bu/s
1 cubic inch per millisecond = 0.4650254369 bushel per seconds.
Real-world example
60 in3/ms × 0.4650254369 = 27.90152621 bu/s
60 cubic inches per millisecond = 27.90152621 bushel per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) | Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/ms | 0.0465025437 bu/s |
| 1 in3/ms | 0.4650254369 bu/s |
| 10 in3/ms | 4.650254369 bu/s |
| 60 in3/ms | 27.90152621 bu/s |
| 100 in3/ms | 46.50254369 bu/s |
| 1,000 in3/ms | 465.0254369 bu/s |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Seconds to Cubic inch per Millisecond
0.4650254369 bu/s × 2.15042 = 1 in3/ms
0.4650254369 bushel per seconds = 1 cubic inches per millisecond.
cubic inches per millisecond = bushel per seconds × 2.15042
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Seconds to Cubic inch per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per seconds are in 1 cubic inch per millisecond?
1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.4650254369 bushel per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond to bushel per seconds?
Multiply the cubic inch per millisecond value by 0.4650254369. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per seconds back to cubic inch per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per seconds equals 2.15042 cubic inches per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per millisecond to bushel per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per millisecond and bushel per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.4650254369 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.