Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inches per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — in3/ms to cL/s
Convert Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per millisecond = 1,638.7064 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inches per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.016387064 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inches per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds
Cubic inch per Millisecond and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = cubic inches per millisecond × 1638.7064
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per millisecond-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 1638.7064.
Simple example
1 in3/ms × 1638.7064 = 1,638.7064 cL/s
1 cubic inch per millisecond = 1,638.7064 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 in3/ms × 1638.7064 = 98,322.384 cL/s
60 cubic inches per millisecond = 98,322.384 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/ms | 163.87064 cL/s |
| 1 in3/ms | 1,638.7064 cL/s |
| 10 in3/ms | 16,387.064 cL/s |
| 60 in3/ms | 98,322.384 cL/s |
| 100 in3/ms | 163,870.64 cL/s |
| 1,000 in3/ms | 1,638,706.4 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic inch per Millisecond
1 cL/s × 0.0006102374409 = 0.0006102374 in3/ms
1 centiliter per seconds = 0.0006102374 cubic inches per millisecond.
cubic inches per millisecond = centiliter per seconds × 0.000610237440947
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic inch per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 cubic inch per millisecond?
1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 1,638.7064 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic inch per millisecond value by 1638.7064. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to cubic inch per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.0006102374 cubic inches per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per millisecond to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per millisecond and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1638.7064 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.