Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inch per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — in3/s to bu/ms
Convert Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per seconds = 4.650254e-7 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inch per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.6387064e-5 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inch per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond
Cubic inch per Seconds and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = cubic inch per seconds × 4.650254e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 0.000016387064 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per seconds-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 4.650254e-7.
Simple example
1 in3/s × 4.650254e-7 = 4.650254e-7 bu/ms
1 cubic inch per seconds = 4.650254e-7 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 in3/s × 4.650254e-7 = 0.0000279015 bu/ms
60 cubic inch per seconds = 0.0000279015 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/s | 4.650254e-8 bu/ms |
| 1 in3/s | 4.650254e-7 bu/ms |
| 10 in3/s | 0.0000046503 bu/ms |
| 60 in3/s | 0.0000279015 bu/ms |
| 100 in3/s | 0.0000465025 bu/ms |
| 1,000 in3/s | 0.0004650254 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic inch per Seconds
4.650254e-7 bu/ms × 2150420 = 0.9999999207 in3/s
4.650254e-7 bushels per millisecond = 0.9999999207 cubic inch per seconds.
cubic inch per seconds = bushels per millisecond × 2150420
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic inch per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 cubic inch per seconds?
1 cubic inch per seconds equals 4.650254e-7 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per seconds to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic inch per seconds value by 4.650254e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to cubic inch per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 2,150,420 cubic inch per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per seconds?
Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per seconds to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per seconds and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.650254e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.