Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inch per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — in3/s to mm3/min
Convert Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per seconds = 983,223.84 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inch per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.6387064e-5 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inch per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Cubic inch per Seconds and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = cubic inch per seconds × 983223.84
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 0.000016387064 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per seconds-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 983223.84.
Simple example
1 in3/s × 983223.84 = 983,223.84 mm3/min
1 cubic inch per seconds = 983,223.84 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 in3/s × 983223.84 = 58,993,430.4 mm3/min
60 cubic inch per seconds = 58,993,430.4 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/s | 98,322.384 mm3/min |
| 1 in3/s | 983,223.84 mm3/min |
| 10 in3/s | 9,832,238.4 mm3/min |
| 60 in3/s | 58,993,430.4 mm3/min |
| 100 in3/s | 98,322,384 mm3/min |
| 1,000 in3/s | 983,223,840 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic inch per Seconds
1 mm3/min × 0.000001017062402 = 0.0000010171 in3/s
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000010171 cubic inch per seconds.
cubic inch per seconds = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.00000101706240158
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic inch per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 cubic inch per seconds?
1 cubic inch per seconds equals 983,223.84 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per seconds to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic inch per seconds value by 983223.84. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to cubic inch per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0000010171 cubic inch per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per seconds?
Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per seconds to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per seconds and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 983223.84 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.