Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — in3/wk to mm3/min
Convert Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per weeks = 1.625700794 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.70950132e-11 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inch per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Cubic inch per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = cubic inch per weeks × 1.62570079365
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2.709501e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 1.62570079365.
Simple example
1 in3/wk × 1.625700794 = 1.625700794 mm3/min
1 cubic inch per weeks = 1.625700794 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 in3/wk × 1.625700794 = 97.54204762 mm3/min
60 cubic inch per weeks = 97.54204762 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/wk | 0.1625700794 mm3/min |
| 1 in3/wk | 1.625700794 mm3/min |
| 10 in3/wk | 16.25700794 mm3/min |
| 60 in3/wk | 97.54204762 mm3/min |
| 100 in3/wk | 162.5700794 mm3/min |
| 1,000 in3/wk | 1,625.700794 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic inch per Weeks
1.625700794 mm3/min × 0.6151193405 = 1 in3/wk
1.625700794 cubic millimeter per minutes = 1 cubic inch per weeks.
cubic inch per weeks = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.615119340475
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic inch per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 cubic inch per weeks?
1 cubic inch per weeks equals 1.625700794 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic inch per weeks value by 1.625700794. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to cubic inch per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.6151193405 cubic inch per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per weeks?
Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per weeks and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.625700794 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.