Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours Converter — in3/wk to imp pt/h
Convert Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) to Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per weeks = 0.00017165 imperial pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.70950132e-11 / 1.57850347e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inch per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours
Cubic inch per Weeks and Imperial pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per hours = cubic inch per weeks × 0.000171650007139
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2.709501e-11 base units, and 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per weeks-to-imperial pint per hours factor of 0.000171650007139.
Simple example
1 in3/wk × 0.0001716500071 = 0.00017165 imp pt/h
1 cubic inch per weeks = 0.00017165 imperial pint per hours.
Real-world example
60 in3/wk × 0.0001716500071 = 0.0102990004 imp pt/h
60 cubic inch per weeks = 0.0102990004 imperial pint per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) | Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/wk | 0.000017165 imp pt/h |
| 1 in3/wk | 0.00017165 imp pt/h |
| 10 in3/wk | 0.0017165001 imp pt/h |
| 60 in3/wk | 0.0102990004 imp pt/h |
| 100 in3/wk | 0.0171650007 imp pt/h |
| 1,000 in3/wk | 0.1716500071 imp pt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic inch per Weeks
0.00017165 imp pt/h × 5825.808089 = 0.9999999584 in3/wk
0.00017165 imperial pint per hours = 0.9999999584 cubic inch per weeks.
cubic inch per weeks = imperial pint per hours × 5825.80808862
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic inch per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per hours are in 1 cubic inch per weeks?
1 cubic inch per weeks equals 0.00017165 imperial pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per weeks to imperial pint per hours?
Multiply the cubic inch per weeks value by 0.0001716500071. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours back to cubic inch per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 5,825.808089 cubic inch per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per weeks?
Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per weeks to imperial pint per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per weeks and imperial pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0001716500071 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.