Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — in3/wk to imp qt/h
Convert Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per weeks = 0.000085825 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.70950132e-11 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inch per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
Cubic inch per Weeks and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = cubic inch per weeks × 0.0000858250035693
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2.709501e-11 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per weeks-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 0.0000858250035693.
Simple example
1 in3/wk × 0.00008582500357 = 0.000085825 imp qt/h
1 cubic inch per weeks = 0.000085825 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 in3/wk × 0.00008582500357 = 0.0051495002 imp qt/h
60 cubic inch per weeks = 0.0051495002 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/wk | 0.0000085825 imp qt/h |
| 1 in3/wk | 0.000085825 imp qt/h |
| 10 in3/wk | 0.00085825 imp qt/h |
| 60 in3/wk | 0.0051495002 imp qt/h |
| 100 in3/wk | 0.0085825004 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 in3/wk | 0.0858250036 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic inch per Weeks
0.000085825 imp qt/h × 11651.61618 = 0.9999999584 in3/wk
0.000085825 imperial quart per hours = 0.9999999584 cubic inch per weeks.
cubic inch per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 11651.6161772
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic inch per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 cubic inch per weeks?
1 cubic inch per weeks equals 0.000085825 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per weeks to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the cubic inch per weeks value by 0.00008582500357. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to cubic inch per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 11,651.61618 cubic inch per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per weeks?
Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per weeks to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per weeks and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00008582500357 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.