Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days Converter — in3/wk to metric tsp/d
Convert Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic inch per weeks = 0.4682018286 metric teaspoon per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic inch per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.70950132e-11 / 5.78703704e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic inch per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days
Cubic inch per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per days = cubic inch per weeks × 0.468201828571
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic inch per weeks equals 2.709501e-11 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per days equals 5.787037e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic inch per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per days factor of 0.468201828571.
Simple example
1 in3/wk × 0.4682018286 = 0.4682018286 metric tsp/d
1 cubic inch per weeks = 0.4682018286 metric teaspoon per days.
Real-world example
60 in3/wk × 0.4682018286 = 28.09210971 metric tsp/d
60 cubic inch per weeks = 28.09210971 metric teaspoon per days.
Conversion table
| Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 in3/wk | 0.0468201829 metric tsp/d |
| 1 in3/wk | 0.4682018286 metric tsp/d |
| 10 in3/wk | 4.682018286 metric tsp/d |
| 60 in3/wk | 28.09210971 metric tsp/d |
| 100 in3/wk | 46.82018286 metric tsp/d |
| 1,000 in3/wk | 468.2018286 metric tsp/d |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Days to Cubic inch per Weeks
0.4682018286 metric tsp/d × 2.135831043 = 1 in3/wk
0.4682018286 metric teaspoon per days = 1 cubic inch per weeks.
cubic inch per weeks = metric teaspoon per days × 2.13583104332
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Days to Cubic inch per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per days are in 1 cubic inch per weeks?
1 cubic inch per weeks equals 0.4682018286 metric teaspoon per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic inch per weeks to metric teaspoon per days?
Multiply the cubic inch per weeks value by 0.4682018286. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per days back to cubic inch per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per days equals 2.135831043 cubic inch per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic inch per weeks?
Cubic inch per Weeks (in3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per days?
Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic inch per weeks to metric teaspoon per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic inch per weeks and metric teaspoon per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.4682018286 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.