Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Days to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond Converter — m3/d to mm3/ms
Convert Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) to Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per days = 11.57407407 cubic millimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Days to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-5 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Days to Cubic Millimeters per Millisecond
Cubic Meter per Days and Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per millisecond = cubic meter per days × 11.5740740741
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0000115740740741 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per days-to-cubic millimeter per millisecond factor of 11.5740740741.
Simple example
1 m3/d × 11.57407407 = 11.57407407 mm3/ms
1 cubic meter per days = 11.57407407 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 m3/d × 11.57407407 = 694.4444444 mm3/ms
60 cubic meter per days = 694.4444444 cubic millimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) | Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/d | 1.157407407 mm3/ms |
| 1 m3/d | 11.57407407 mm3/ms |
| 10 m3/d | 115.7407407 mm3/ms |
| 60 m3/d | 694.4444444 mm3/ms |
| 100 m3/d | 1,157.407407 mm3/ms |
| 1,000 m3/d | 11,574.07407 mm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Days
11.57407407 mm3/ms × 0.0864 = 0.9999999996 m3/d
11.57407407 cubic millimeters per millisecond = 0.9999999996 cubic meter per days.
cubic meter per days = cubic millimeters per millisecond × 0.0864
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond to Cubic Meter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per millisecond are in 1 cubic meter per days?
1 cubic meter per days equals 11.57407407 cubic millimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per days to cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic meter per days value by 11.57407407. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per millisecond back to cubic meter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per millisecond equals 0.0864 cubic meter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per days?
Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Millimeter per Millisecond (mm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per days to cubic millimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per days and cubic millimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 11.57407407 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.