Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — m3/d to imp qt/h
Convert Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per days = 36.66154138 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-5 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Hours
Cubic Meter per Days and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = cubic meter per days × 36.6615413832
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0000115740740741 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per days-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 36.6615413832.
Simple example
1 m3/d × 36.66154138 = 36.66154138 imp qt/h
1 cubic meter per days = 36.66154138 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 m3/d × 36.66154138 = 2,199.692483 imp qt/h
60 cubic meter per days = 2,199.692483 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/d | 3.666154138 imp qt/h |
| 1 m3/d | 36.66154138 imp qt/h |
| 10 m3/d | 366.6154138 imp qt/h |
| 60 m3/d | 2,199.692483 imp qt/h |
| 100 m3/d | 3,666.154138 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 m3/d | 36,661.54138 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Days
36.66154138 imp qt/h × 0.02727654 = 0.9999999999 m3/d
36.66154138 imperial quart per hours = 0.9999999999 cubic meter per days.
cubic meter per days = imperial quart per hours × 0.02727654
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Cubic Meter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 cubic meter per days?
1 cubic meter per days equals 36.66154138 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per days to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the cubic meter per days value by 36.66154138. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to cubic meter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.02727654 cubic meter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per days?
Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per days to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per days and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 36.66154138 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.