Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Minutes Converter — m3/d to imp qt/min
Convert Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) to Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per days = 0.6110256897 imperial quart per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-5 / 1.89420417e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Minutes
Cubic Meter per Days and Imperial quart per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per minutes = cubic meter per days × 0.61102568972
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0000115740740741 base units, and 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0000189420416667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per days-to-imperial quart per minutes factor of 0.61102568972.
Simple example
1 m3/d × 0.6110256897 = 0.6110256897 imp qt/min
1 cubic meter per days = 0.6110256897 imperial quart per minutes.
Real-world example
60 m3/d × 0.6110256897 = 36.66154138 imp qt/min
60 cubic meter per days = 36.66154138 imperial quart per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) | Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/d | 0.061102569 imp qt/min |
| 1 m3/d | 0.6110256897 imp qt/min |
| 10 m3/d | 6.110256897 imp qt/min |
| 60 m3/d | 36.66154138 imp qt/min |
| 100 m3/d | 61.10256897 imp qt/min |
| 1,000 m3/d | 611.0256897 imp qt/min |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Days
0.6110256897 imp qt/min × 1.6365924 = 1 m3/d
0.6110256897 imperial quart per minutes = 1 cubic meter per days.
cubic meter per days = imperial quart per minutes × 1.6365924
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Minutes to Cubic Meter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per minutes are in 1 cubic meter per days?
1 cubic meter per days equals 0.6110256897 imperial quart per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per days to imperial quart per minutes?
Multiply the cubic meter per days value by 0.6110256897. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per minutes back to cubic meter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 1.6365924 cubic meter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per days?
Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per minutes?
Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per days to imperial quart per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per days and imperial quart per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.6110256897 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.