Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — m3/d to imp qt/s
Convert Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic meter per days = 0.0101837615 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-5 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Meter per Days to Imperial quart per Seconds
Cubic Meter per Days and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = cubic meter per days × 0.0101837614953
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0000115740740741 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic meter per days-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 0.0101837614953.
Simple example
1 m3/d × 0.0101837615 = 0.0101837615 imp qt/s
1 cubic meter per days = 0.0101837615 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 m3/d × 0.0101837615 = 0.6110256897 imp qt/s
60 cubic meter per days = 0.6110256897 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 m3/d | 0.0010183762 imp qt/s |
| 1 m3/d | 0.0101837615 imp qt/s |
| 10 m3/d | 0.101837615 imp qt/s |
| 60 m3/d | 0.6110256897 imp qt/s |
| 100 m3/d | 1.01837615 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 m3/d | 10.1837615 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Days
0.0101837615 imp qt/s × 98.195544 = 1 m3/d
0.0101837615 imperial quart per seconds = 1 cubic meter per days.
cubic meter per days = imperial quart per seconds × 98.195544
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Cubic Meter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 cubic meter per days?
1 cubic meter per days equals 0.0101837615 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic meter per days to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the cubic meter per days value by 0.0101837615. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to cubic meter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 98.195544 cubic meter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic meter per days?
Cubic Meter per Days (m3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic meter per days to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic meter per days and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0101837615 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.